Well, it seems that there are nine weeks in the Challenge XI "Completed" column and you know what that means - yet another astounding Statistical Update. Neither rain, nor snow, nor pandemic, nor actual audience interest shall deter me from force feeding you statistical gibberish.
That's just how I roll.
Presented below is the now world famous incomprehensible wall of numbers which summarizes the progress of our collective pigment crusade through 4 weeks and then 9 weeks (as of Feb 20) and third column is where we stood at 9 weeks in for last years challenge.
You'll find none of those hip and garrish graphics in this report - just cold hard numbers in rows and columns. I make you work for the knowledge rather than spoon feeding you the "high-points" and distracting you with pretty colors and slices of pie charts. One day, when you find yourself on the streets or in a back alley, without a white board and colored dry-ears markers while being confronted by a gang of hopped-up academic thugs challenging you to an equation derivation throwdown, you'll thank me for preparing you to be able to do so.
As with all challenges we do see a little productivity drop off during weeks 5 - 9 vs the blistering pace of weeks 1 - 4. Scientists have many theories why this occurs and the research is ongoing. It really is one of the great mysteries of the universe.
One of the more interesting trends for this second month is that our blistering pace from month one has slowed a bit and we are back in line with more standard levels of productivity when compared to Challenge X. Specifically points per participant for 9 weeks during XI are now 615 vs 613 from Challenge X - thats pretty much spot on.
We are seeing the absolute numbers of submissions a good bit higher than last year (838 vs 583) - most of that is due to a larger number of participants but there is about a 11% increase in productivity with the average number of submissions for XI being 10 vs 9 from X. It does make the class oppressing capitalist in me smile when thinking of all of you as happy little workers toiling away to increase measured productivity.
Now I shall allow you to gaze upon the incomprehensible wall of numbers in all it's terrible beauty. Look and be amazed (queue angelic harp music here):
Something is incredibly off with this post. No, not the fact that the table is a little too wide so the final column is partly hidden by the Roster in the side-bar.
ReplyDeleteNo, it's the distinct lack of mention of sacrificial kittens and arcane incantations...
I received an outreach from someone who didn't see the intended humor so no more of that. Jokes are funny until their not and so I'll find some other way to inject some humor. That's what friends do
DeleteAnd, Tamsin, the table is not a little too wide, the web page is a little too narrow. I think that is obvious to us all.
Delete:)
And what about the GIMP?
ReplyDeleteThere are very secret deliberations going on about that topic as we speak - very hush-hush so don't tell anyone else
DeleteI wonder if there's any reason why "numbers" start with "numb"? No, can't think of anything.
ReplyDeleteAs far as I can see, no-one else needs to paint much more. Miles, you're surely planning to provide all the missing points yourself!
Oh there will be a few more points from me but not as many as you think
DeleteTerrific work Miles. I'm truly in number-shocked awe.
ReplyDeleteIf we hit your projected 80,398 target will that be a new Challenge points record?
I too hope to have a 10mm submission near the end to help that flagging stat.