British Cruiser Tanks |
The Cruiser tank concept was a typically British approach to tank design that flourished in the inter-war period, saw action during the start and middle of the war and began to die out in favor of the Main Battle Tank concept by the end of the war. British tank nomenclature is particularly confusing but here we have two examples of Cruiser development, one more successful than the other.
A13 Mk III, Cruiser Mk V or Covenanter |
The Cruiser Mk V was conceived in 1938 with the General Staff specifying the need for a faster, lighter cruiser tank to replace the Cruiser IV. The new specification was the A13 Mk III Cruiser Mark V, and would later be given the name Covenanter. The new tank would have a Christie suspension and would have to be able to accommodate the main British tank gun of the time, the QF 2 Pounder. Some design elements from the earlier A16 were incorporated in the new tank as was the use of sloped armour to reduce thickness and therefore weight.
Covenanter's ready for action |
By the late 30's the governments policy was to encourage British firms to develop the skills for war production and so the contract to design the A13 was handed to a Railway Company which had no prior experience of producing tanks (!). With war on the horizon the first order for 100 tanks was placed without a proper prototype evaluation process. The result was a tank that had a shopping list of problems and defects, not least issues related to engine cooling and reliability. This was a tank not destined for combat duty and most were retained in the UK for training purposes. However a few were given to REME for desert evaluation and its possible that some saw action with the Churchill Tanks of Kingforce in 1942.
Covenanter's are identified by the rather high profile and four road wheels |
Initial production of the Covenanter was shared between several firms but Nufield preferred to pursue its own design which would later become the Cruiser, Mk VI or A15 Crusader. The Crusader Mark I and Mark II were fitted with am Ordnance QF 2 pounder main gun, but the design was also able to accommodate modification so that the Crusader III was fitted with an Ordnance QF 6 pounder main gun. Like the A13 the A15 used the Christie suspension system but employed 5 road wheels rather than four to aid with weight distribution. The Crusader would weigh in at close to 20 tones compared to 14 tones for the Covenanter.
A15 Cruiser, Mk VI or Crusader I |
The A15 was also ordered straight off the drawing board and although it would become the main British Cruiser in the early part of the desert war, it still had significant design problems. The angled turret proved something of a shot trap, deflecting incoming AP into the roof of the crew compartment. The tank was also prone to 'brewing up' with stowed ammunition catching fire when the tank was hit. The cooling system struggled with desert sand and the engine was prone to oil leaks and unreliable performance. None the less the Crusader was well loved by British Crews and it wasn't until the arrival of American tanks like the Grant and Sherman that this weary warhorse began to be phased out.
The Crusader I has five road wheels to distribute its greater weight |
I've always liked the look and idea of the British cruiser tanks, even if they were often easy pickings for their opponents in the desert.
Nice work on these GHQ models and well worth the 16 points they've earned you.
Well done Lee, I love the early to mid-war British tanks defaults and all. I am continually impressed by the results you get on these teeny tiny little tanks.
ReplyDeleteGHQ's 1/285th scale minis are quite expensive compared to H&R or Scotia but the quality is outstanding. Masses of crisp detail and zero defects in the casting make these worth every penny.
DeleteI love the models and the way that you've made them into little dioramas with the basing. Ive yet to play a micro armour game that I liked however, they are turn into Space Invader shootouts where the tanks blow each other up and the infantry sit around and watch the show.
DeleteAnd how is this different than history Peter?
DeleteOther than the complete lack of interim cooperation between infantry armour and artillery? Which granted is historical for early war allied armies, but not what I read about much after 1940.
DeleteI dunno Peter. I've played many rules that use microarmour at grand scale (Contact II, Spearhead, Command Decision, etc.) and they all reflect the cooperation (or lack thereof) between the fighting arms. They never look like 'Space Invaders' to me. Perhaps you just don't like the look of it? Horses for Courses, of course.
DeleteWe can take that argument off line and over Chianti. let's focus on Lee's models and basing which are farking awesome!
DeleteAgreed! (Especially the Chianti part) :)
Deleteto accompany a dish of liver and fava beans? ;)
DeleteIndeed...
DeleteWhat crackers mate. But you might have to put an arrow on the base so Ray knows which way is forward!
ReplyDeleteVery nice mate!
ReplyDeleteGood work.
ReplyDeleteBeautiful little toys. I like the puffs of dust you added.
ReplyDeleteBeautiful work Lee. I really appreciate the historical background to the vehicles as it sets the tone for the submission. Like Sylvain, I quite like those dust clouds. How do you do them?
ReplyDeletePaint soaked clump foliage. When dry they harden and can be highlighted.
DeleteSure, that would do the trick. A great mod Lee, thanks for the info!
DeleteWell done on those tiny little steel coffins.
ReplyDeleteAwesome! The Crusader is my favourite "fast" tank of the war. They looks like a greyhound.
ReplyDeleteAlways love your armour Lee, again great 6mm work
ReplyDeleteIan
Great stuff Lee. The British and their tanks...such awful, awful tanks...excellent brush work, and I love the dust clouds.
ReplyDeletewell done! the paintwork on this small scale is so difficult.
ReplyDeleteNice work! The dust clouds are a really nice touch!
ReplyDeleteLovely work! I'm booking myself in for a game with these should the opportunity arise! :-)
ReplyDelete